Wednesday, August 21, 2013

The Friend Zone: Time to put on your big boy/girl pants.


“I do so much for this person, I listen to them and I am here when they need me. I am nice and I make an effort but they don’t notice me and just want to be my friend. All (insert gender here) suck.”

I see variations of this comment very often, the internet is full of friend zone references. There are forums dedicated to it, memes outlining the pure injustice of it all and many WikiHelp articles telling us how to GTFO* of this dreaded purgatory-like state and into the arms/heart/bed of that special someone. As such, the friend zone has become steeped in negative connotations.

As a woman that has both been ‘friend zoned’ more than once in her life and as someone who has had to friend zone quite a few men lately, I would like to say that this mentality is frankly quite pathetic. So you got rejected by someone? Yes it hurts, but we all go through it and is it really their fault for not being attracted to you? Oh, so they want to be your friend because they actually care about you? What a shitty thing for them to do!


This meme is called Friend Zone Fiona. The top caption typically shows something that someone would say to their love interest and then contrasted by the bottom line that shows that she is actually just a friend. It is a passive aggressive way for men (women have other memes) to bitch about how unfair the friend zone is. I personally think that these men should pull up their big boy pants and see that this chick actually sounds like a pretty legit friend.  

Pop culture describes the ‘friend zone’ as a platonic relationship where one person wishes to enter into a romantic or sexual relationship while the other doesn’t. It is generally considered to be a rather lamentable situation by the one that wants more (and let’s face it, unrequited love always is pretty lamentable). The term 'friend zone' was coined by the writers of Friends way back in 1994 in an episode called 'The Blackout' where Joey refers to Ross as "The mayor of the friend zone" when describing his relationship with Rachel. As someone who has been a fan of the gang from Central Perk since I was 8, I am forced to forgive the writers since I am convinced that they didn't know what they were starting.

I am not denying that there are many selfish people who intentionally lead you on so that they can keep you around to stroke their ego, those people are douche-bags and you are better off far away from them. I am not wasting my energy talking about them.

Some men and women who claim to be in the friend zone believe that they are entitled to relationship because they have been kind and caring and then place blame on the other person for not wanting a relationship. What crap is that? Everyone has a right to choice in that situation. There should be no pressure or feelings of obligation to return those feelings. Similarly, if someone does say no to you, it doesn’t make them an awful person- especially if you two are supposedly friends. 




Here is an example of the negative ranting about this dreaded friend zone that is littered throughout the Web.
 (as seen on Urban Dictionary).

 There are so many reasons that someone may not want to start a romantic or sexual relationship with you and surprisingly enough, some of those reasons aren’t even personal. Sometimes people are going through issues and actually cannot deal with the thought of being in a relationship, or maybe they are looking for a boyfriend or girlfriend to play a different role than the one you can provide (or maybe you should just stop wearing that ultra-lame fedora). 

I love my male friends. I have held them through the worst times, listened to every girl problem under the sun and will do nearly anything for them without expecting anything in return. Assuming or wanting sex to happen with a friend show that your motives are not friendship based and maybe you should re-evaluate your view of what being friends actually means. If you don’t want to be in someone’s friend zone then DON’T be their friend. Friendship is a beautiful gift; the friend zone is a choice.

I apologise if I come off sounding a bit harsh but I am sick of guys and girls complaining about being ‘put in the friend zone’. If we didn’t ‘friend-zone’ most men/women then we would all be considered Slutty mcWhoresons and we wouldn’t have many friends.

It could be for the best. Who wants to be with someone that doesn't want to be with them?

Now don’t get me wrong, I know it is hard and heart breaking to be passed over as a romantic interest. I have done my time in a thought prison built on “what ifs” (this is coming from a girl who has read 'He's Just Not That Into You' about 10 times). But I think there comes a time where one needs to cut out for the sake of self-preservation. Maybe downgrade your ‘friend’ status to that of an acquaintance- your ‘friend’ could be offended or confused by your actions but you can’t control how you feel just like they can’t control how they feel and you can explain it to them if needs be.

Also consider the fact that you are tying up your feelings by staying friends with someone who doesn’t want anything more. You could possibly be passing up the opportunity of developing another relationship with someone who is going to give you what you deserve by staying in this victim-like state. Do you really want to be filled with jealousy and frustration when you see him/her enjoying life with someone else?  Nope? Didn’t think so.


*Get the fuck out 

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Paying Attention To Distraction



 "There's no shell script, there's no fancy pen, there's no notebook or nap or Firefox extension or hack that's gonna help you figure out why the fuck you're here. That's on you" - Merlin Mann

Ok Kelly, close your email tab. Good girl… Now just check to see if there are any comments on Facebook since you checked 3 seconds ago. Close that too. Nearly there!  Now just kill 9gag, Twitter, Reddit and that article about the origin of Nyan cat and then you’ll be all set. All gone? Well done. Now you can sit down and concentrate on writing your blog post about distraction. Ironic, isn’t it? 

I am going through a breakup. As you all know, they can be pretty tough. My usual way of dealing with this sort of thing is to immerse myself in cute but forgettable images of baby animals in various human disguises, or to post statuses with painfully transparent lyrics in an attempt to get my friends to understand the depths of my agony. Other times I would form new Facebook based friendships and immerse myself in them. These distractions allow me to avoid the obvious unpleasant realities.

The good news is that I am older and a little bit wiser (I would like to think) and I have enough brains to question whether my old methods served me well or whether I should try something new. The question on my mind is: are distractions always a bad thing? 

My uncle explained to me the theory of unfinished cycles. Humans have a finite amount of attention. When we abandon a process that has caught our attention and go onto the next, we have less attention to devote to a new task. Facebook, Twitter and everywhere else on the web that acts as platforms for interaction can make it impossible to complete certain cycles since you are always waiting for a reaction to something you have posted or a reply to a message. This makes it difficult to be present and fully aware.

With the rise of the internet, which brings with it plenty distraction and oceans of information, people have started to name the situation that we are facing as “The Poverty of Attention”. Years before the inventors of Google were even born, an economist by the name of Herbert A Simon succinctly described our current plight: “What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients. Hence a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention and a need to allocate that attention efficiently among the overabundance of information sources that might consume it”. 

While this argument has merits, I believe that the internet – through the wealth of knowledge it provides – can also offer constructive pathways for focussed change. The internet does not necessarily only consume, it can also give.

 Last week I wrote a post on how social media can kill relationships. In the post I highlighted the importance of being mindful when using the internet to distract from introspection and working on yourself but, during a 3 hour hike, I realised that some form of distractions are not only healthy, but incredibly necessary.

Our primitive brains are always on the lookout for threats, both physical and emotional. Distraction can give you a break from these threats in order to come back to them once you have gathered enough strength to face them. The key is moderation and mindfulness.

Through Facebook I found a free fitness group that was going on a hike the very next day after my break up. I didn’t know anyone that was going but I realised that in order to keep swimming I needed to take my mind on a bit of a holiday and stock up on serotonin. Three hours, 50 gallons of sweat and a mini asthma attack later I was in higher spirits and ready to face reality and sit with my thoughts. Without Facebook, I would not have had this opportunity.

Edward de Bono has a great theory. He said that creativity requires breaking rigid thought patterns. He explained that when you think a certain thought more than once, a neural pathway is created and the more you think that thought (or a similar one) that particular pathway is thickened and strengthened, making it easy to surrender yourself to a certain way of thinking over and over again.

Now what I am trying to communicate here is that when you are going through changes in your life there is a forced breakdown of neural pathways that are nice and thick from daily use. Not automatically using those well-established pathways can be incredibly hard. For example, when I stopped smoking I had to surrender to the neural pathways linked to smoking breaking down. I then had to build new ones by thinking new thoughts until they become natural and the old pathways fell away. So basically, if you keep thinking and doing the same old things, you will never give yourself the opportunity to change. 

While I may be dealing with sadness right now, I am also revelling in the incredible feeling of my mind opening and in a strange way it is kind of beautiful. I can feel the neural pathways that were used to a certain way of living crumbling and collapsing on themselves. I am suddenly forced to be the town planner of my own head.  I can choose which thought patterns I want to get rid of and which I want to develop. It would be a tragedy if I chose to clog my mind up with too many distractions like Nyan cat and baby manatees. On the other hand, habits like hiking and meditation, accessed through the internet, are undoubtedly healthy.

Life changes shouldn’t be ignored by immersing yourself in distractions all the time. These are times to find your own definitions of things without the input of consensus reality (a la Facebook). However, shutting yourself off from the world’s wealth of knowledge and experience can also be detrimental since our jobs and social lives do depend on a degree of connectivity. Let the internet be a tool: use the creative energy that distractions spark to inspire focussed change. Allow yourself the opportunity to do the town planning in your own head.